The understandable folderol
about Don Sterling and his foul mouth and his Clippers franchise [his personal
property] raises many interesting, telling, and sometimes disturbing issues,
over and above the rankness of his bigoted speech. For instance, I was amused to note that a
friend who pretends to value free speech and balance deleted my comment on his Facebook
page, along the lines of this post, about the lifetime ban of Donald Sterling,
which sadly might say more about him than Sterling's known foul mouth said
about him.
I think the punishment
of Sterling is quite over the top. Sterling is a jerk, a bigot, an asshole, and
he deserves whatever loathing comes his way. However, official, regulatory
ostracism is not a standard practiced in this country. And there are many team-members who also fit
that description [including one who labeled the teams "black teams"],
some of whom liberally use the "n" word while decrying those of other
races who use it, and their racism is similarly revolting, and yet we don't see
them banned, punished, highlighted as the cretins they are, etc.
Just as it is
Un-American to practice ostracism, it is also un-American to deprive a person
of the use and enjoyment of his property, which he alone assumed the risk to
build up, to the same extent that it is un-American to be a bigot [although I
suspect a high percentage of Americans really are bigots of various sorts!],
and I think we should tread carefully before we allow collective moral
self-righteousness be the measure by which WE decide if YOU can keep and enjoy
your property and pursuit of happiness.
Make no mistake about
it - I think Sterling is a scumbag and he has earned a place on the lower rungs
of Dante's Inferno. We need to be careful, though, that we don't slip down
close to him by our actions and public and private thoughts, glass houses and stones and the like.