If there is any doubt that the government has pushed
us to the edge of the abyss and its yawning depths seductively leer back at us,
a recent First Amendment case in San Diego, pressed by the Obama Administration
[although there is no reason to believe that the previous Cheney Administration
would not have done the same] should erase all doubts.
A second plaintiff, Ray Askins,
was treated even more shabbily: “On or
about April 19, 2012, Mr. Askins took ‘three or four photographs of the exit of
the secondary inspection area’ while standing approximately ‘50-100 feet from the
exit from the secondary inspection area.’ When he took these pictures, he was
in the United States and ‘not engaged in the act of crossing the border.’ After
Mr. Askins took the pictures, CBP officers demanded Mr. Askins delete the
photos. Mr. Askins refused, and the officers stated they would ‘smash the
camera if Mr. Askins did not delete the photos.’ He again declined, explaining
that the photos were his property. At that point, the officers handcuffed Mr.
Askins and took his camera, passport, car keys, and hat. Mr. Askins was
forcefully lead into a small room inside the secondary inspection area and told
to sit down. He was not free to leave. He was next lead to a separate room
where he was ‘subjected . . . to an invasive and embarrassing physical search.’
After the search, the officers told Mr. Askins he was free to go and returned
his belongings. Upon inspection of his phone, he realized that three of the
four pictures he had taken of the port of entry had been deleted.”
Recalling as we must, but obviously increasingly forgotten
by “The Man,” which now sadly includes the Courts [despite Federalist 78], the core of the speech/press protections recognized
by the First Amendment [not created but recognized] is political speech. Keeping our government [OUR government] in
check by writing about and otherwise publicizing its activities was understood
by the Framers to be the summum bonum
of First Amendment values. Political
speech was to have virtually no limitation, because the power of the people
over its government has no limitation – we are the government, and its actors
are our servants.
That being the founding and fundamental understanding,
the recent Ramirez v. Homeland Security,
CASE NO. 12-CV-2600 W (BLM), in the Southern District, Hon. Thomas Whelan, is most alarming. Mr. Ramirez, an American citizen, was coming
back across the border from Mexico on foot when he saw some male immigration
officers hand-searching [groping?] females who were crossing over at the
pedestrian checkpoint below him. They
were only patting down females. Sensing
that was not right [because it isn’t], he took out his smart phone and took about
10 pictures of the unsettling event.
A uniformed thug from the department asked for his papers
and demanded the camera. Mr. Ramirez
advised that he had already cleared through lawfully and he declined the
demands, and he took a picture of the officer.
He was then accosted by more
immigration cops. “Mr. Ramirez told the
officers that he had taken photographs of ‘what he believed to be inappropriate
activity by CBP officers at the checkpoint–namely, the patting down of women by
male officers.’ After Mr. Ramirez refused the officer’s request to turn over
his phone, he offered to show them the pictures.”
“Then, a U.S Immigration and
Customs Enforcement (“ICE”) agent confronted
Mr. Ramirez and asked him for his
personal identification documents. Mr. Ramirez again refused, and explained
that he and his wife had already been inspected. The ICE agent took Mr.
Ramirez’s and Mr. Ramirez’s wife’s passports and brought them to a nearby
office. While in the office, a CBP
officer scrolled through the photos on Mr. Ramirez’s phone and deleted all the
photos Mr. Ramirez had
taken of the CBP checkpoint. The
ICE agent returned the passports and allowed them to continue on their way.”
This all happened in America,
Folks: the Land of the Free and Home of the Brave, with a court system designed
to protect us from the rapacious Hun – so these victims of American government
brutality had their rights vindicated by the Court, right? Uh…, NO!
“For the foregoing reasons, the
Court finds that CBP’s photography policy survives the strict scrutiny analysis
due to the extremely compelling interest of border security and the fact that
the Court finds the current policy to be the least restrictive alternative
available to Defendants.”
Uh…, HELLOOOO! Is this judge applying to be one of the
pro-American terrorism judges on the secret FISA Court? This ruling is straight out of I. Muller,
Hitler’s Justice: Courts of the Third Reich (Schneider trans. Harvard 1991).
These people are Americans,
standing on American soil, recording what is in open public areas, and the
First Amendment does not protect their recordation of what their government is
doing to fellow citizens??/!
For shame, Judge Thomas Whelan,
for shame. The abyss yawns back at us
with a leer and a sneer.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Be civil, intelligent, and non-confrontational.